悉尼大學商學國貿(mào)雙碩士畢業(yè),現(xiàn)居澳洲,在澳學習生活15+年,從事教育咨詢工作超過10年,澳洲政府注冊教育顧問,上千成功升學轉學簽證案例,定期受邀親自走訪澳洲各類學校
您所在的位置: 首頁> 新聞列表> GMAT作文滿分之路.
如何在gmat作文考試中獲取滿分呢?對于很多計劃參加gmat考試的人來說,要想在gmat考試中獲取好的成績,就必須認真對待gmat考試中的每一個部分,gmat作文考試獲取滿分有哪些秘籍呢?下面就來看看gmat作文滿分是如何練成的。
我的GMAT一戰(zhàn)定在921,上海騰飛大廈。雖已過去一周,個中酸甜苦辣仍歷歷在目。正式考試從AWA作文部分起就一直精神恍惚,心跳加速,雙手發(fā)抖,曾經(jīng)在TOEFL作文上砍瓜切菜的我在打G的作文時雙手完全不聽使喚。后來在“破釜沉舟”的心理暗示下總算平定下來,順利過渡到Math部分。昨天順利收到Official Report,上面赫然寫著AWA:6.0(91%),我那顆撲騰的心啊,總算是安定了下來。此文主要針對AWA寫作,關于Math(Quantitative)和Verbal部分我不想班門弄斧,以免貽笑大方,盡管Math是滿分,但實際只準備了3周,就不誤導各位了。我的AWA寫作是9月15日開始準備的,總共才5天半時間,之前壓根不知G的作文考察神馬東東,依稀了解到有邏輯糾錯型作文(就是后來熟知的AA--Analytical Argument),我便汗顏。因為我的邏輯狂差,怕自己連文章的邏輯謬誤也看不透,于是5天半的準備期里AA訓練了3/4。我想說,GMAT作文不需要像TOEFL作文那樣傾力而為準備,但是一定要用好復習時間中的每一個小時,保證每天都有收獲。第一天要熟悉寫作機經(jīng)題庫,最好把每個題都看一遍,看看過來人如何組織思路,如何展開,如何舉例。不貪多,求質(zhì)量!另外就是出色的模板了。模板對于AA寫作尤為重要,但對于AI寫作,各位G友自己看著辦吧,可以自己去找點模板,反正我覺得在AI中模板是次要的,關鍵是觀點和論據(jù),如果各位看官有TOEFL的寫作背景,那么恭喜你,GMAT AI部分的準備會容易得多。言歸正傳,看完NN的思路、范文和模板后自己可以開始訓練了。記得用標準鍵盤,一開始不限時,天馬行空胡吹亂侃一通,然后對照牛人的作品找差距,自己修改。我第一篇AA寫作用了1小時10分鐘,因為我積累少,思路不正,有些邏輯謬誤看不出來,導致半天熬不出幾句話。這時千萬不要泄氣,不妨看看《孫遠AWA寶典》,絕對受益匪淺。還有,別忘了我們有OG12,這是市面上最權威的官方指南,研究透里面范文的行文和思路絕對能事半功倍!
此外,每個人的弱點并不相同,有的人害怕AA部分,比如像我這種邏輯很麻木的人,而不少人也許害怕AI部分,這時,你就要儲備和積累了。AI就謹記幾條定律:1、盡量寫多(500字以上最好),這樣論點可以充分展開和論述;2、多分段。(5段以上,6,7段最佳)3、舉例子,擺事實,講道理。例子真的很重要,你不需要苦逼地繞啊繞,一味說理,說理的同時舉些例子,能讓文章有血有肉,又能充字數(shù),一舉兩得啊。例子盡量舉實例,如果現(xiàn)編當然也可以,不過你在編人物、組織名稱時最好來個破折號,同位語說明一下這個家伙(或組織)是神馬玩意兒,這樣又能充字數(shù),又能欺騙E-rater,何樂不為?!3、如果你有良好的寫作功底那就多寫復雜句,多來幾個從句套從句,這是非常符合E-rater的口味的。當然這是有風險的,如果沒有系統(tǒng)地訓練過,那就回歸原始的簡單句吧,保證前提是---少出錯,爾后---寫出彩。4、建議多用高級詞匯,不要只會significant,of great importance了,學著用vital,critical,consequential;不要只會用firstly,secondly了,學著用Most conspicuously,the second point worth talking is that……不要等到寫作時囊中空空,這是最苦逼的,寫作是第一部分,倘若G考試沒開好頭,那么會嚴重影響后面的發(fā)揮。
我在考場上自感灰常杯具,因為耳邊只聽得大牛們噠噠噠的鍵盤聲,而自己剛好抽了兩個沒練過的考題,這一坨坨汗啊……后來腫么辦?寫唄,既來之,則安之,反正我是醬油黨,大不了一個月后再戰(zhàn)嘛。這一暗示,讓我頓時思如泉涌,然后就一瀉千里吧??鄲灥氖亲约簶嬎己牧瞬簧贂r間,打字速度也不快,后面狂飆不止,但估計也沒寫夠500字,可見,作文字數(shù)并非決定因素,但是一定要有清晰的行文和邏輯。但還是那句話,盡量寫多吧。引用名人名言或許是一個不錯的選擇。我的AI就以Franklin Roosevelt的名句結尾,可惜的是我背上的話完全因為緊張而一片空白,我就自己編了個從句套從句,大概意思反正是寫出來了。所以,G友們不要害怕記名言,如果真心記不住,那就大致把精華記下來吧。反正E-rater又不會去查證!
澳際提示:
1.GMAT作文解題技巧之從短題目入手
2.GMAT作文考試之ISSUE速成策略
3.gmat作文中的經(jīng)典范文句型
想要獲得更多咨詢服務點擊進入 >>>>有問題?找免費的澳際專家咨詢! 或聯(lián)系QQ客服: ,也可以通過評論處留言,把您最關心的問題告訴我們。
AA自創(chuàng)(again,歡迎板磚):
原題:The following appeared in an Avia Airlines departmental memorandum:
“On average, 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on Avia Airlines last year filed a complaint about our baggage-handling procedures. This means that although some 1 percent of our passengers were unhappy with those procedures, the overwhelming majority were quite satisfied with them; thus it would appear that a review of the procedures is not important to our goal of maintaining or increasing the number of Avia’s passengers.”(39)
提供觀點:
1去年是這樣今年呢以后呢?
2很有可能是乘客對服務不滿意卻沒時間正式申訴
3和別的航空公司比較如何seriousness trivialize
1, 沒有complaint不代表沒有不滿。
2, 沒有跟其他公司對比,同時并不知道總數(shù)。
In the given memorandum, the argument maintains a view that a review of procedures is not important to the goal of the travel company to maintain or increase the number of passengers. To support this idea, the author of the argument points out that only 9 out of every 1,000 passengers who traveled on AA last year were dissatisfied with the baggage-handling procedures. The reasoning process is convincing at first glance, with close examination, however, we can easily find out three logical flaws. I’d like to uncover how groundless this allegation is in the following paragraphs.
Obviously, the argument commits a logical fallacy called either-or thinking. The argument above assumes that there are only two possible results open to us----dissatisfied passengers who complained about the baggage-handling procedures and satisfied passengers who did not file a complaint. But there is no room for a middle ground. It is premature to conclude that those who didn’t file the complaint were indeed the satisfied customers without any further investigation. What if these individuals had no time to file a complaint or they were unwilling to express their dissatisfaction? If the author cannot provide the relative compelling evidences to prove that the customers who did not file a complaint are indeed pleased with the AA’s procedures, the argument is weak and unpersuasive.
The second point worth talking is that the sample raised in the allegation is insufficient. First of all, the author does not quote the total number of the passengers last year. For instance, if there was a total number of 1500 passengers who traveled on AA last year, the 1000 passengers in the sample are dinitely sufficient. But what if there are over 200,000 passengers who took AA last year? The data in the survey are so limited that they are not representative of the entire passengers under consideration. Furthermore, the author of the argument fails to provide affirmative justification that the passengers in the sample are chose at random. Perhaps these biased passengers were well chosen by the board of the AA in order to demonstrate the excellent baggage-handling service to the general public. In the absence of compelling information to justify how these passengers are chose, it is arbitrary to say that a review of the procedures is unimportant.
Finally, the argument assumed without justification that background conditions have remained the same at different times. As is the case presented in the argument, only a small fraction(less than one percent) of the passengers were unsatisfied with the luggage-handling procedures last year. This means an overwhelming majority of the passengers were pleased with the procedure service. Nevertheless, the author of the argument does not necessarily prove that this phenomenon will inevitably happen in the near future. It is an unwarranted assumption for the simple reason that things rarely remain constant over extended periods of time.
In a nutshell, the argument omits several key factors; it is not sound or persuasive. If it involves the items discussed above rather than simply illustrate several numbers in a survey, the argument would have been more thorough and compelling.
澳際提示:
1.GMAT作文解題技巧之從短題目入手
2.GMAT作文考試之ISSUE速成策略
3.gmat作文中的經(jīng)典范文句型
想要獲得更多咨詢服務點擊進入 >>>>有問題?找免費的澳際專家咨詢! 或聯(lián)系QQ客服: ,也可以通過評論處留言,把您最關心的問題告訴我們。
AI自創(chuàng):
“People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.”
Multitudes of people tend to accept someone as a leader only when he can demonstrate an ability to perform the same tasks that he expects others to perform. In my philosophy, I maintain the perspective that a qualified leader should dinitely display something special or prove competent in various tasks in order to win respect of others, especially his or her subordinates. I would like to demonstrate my ideas in the following paragraphs.
Obviously, employees will show great respect and admiration for their supervisors if they are versatile and competent in business fields. This is common sense for the simple reason that subordinates usually appreciate a manager who can out-achieve their accomplishment and often do better jobs in business world. Such kind of employers are worthy of the name. In the same breath, employees are rarely willing to be administered and assigned by an under-competent or a totally layman who lacks relative working experience and skills. A concrete example can attest to this phenomenon. VHS company---a prominent videocassette company in theUS, was in the charge of Franklin Robert during the 1970s. Franklin Robert was a manager full of wisdom and competency and had historical insight into business competitive edge. When confronted with the fierce competition from VDP company(Video Development Pioneer), VHS company’s rival, he took a slightly early lead in manufacture and mass distribution. He proposed cooperation and alliance with other small businesses and distributors, hoping to propagate his company’s unique products and excellent services. Franklin Robert’s advisable strategy, together with his outstanding organizational ability, won respects from all of his subordinates and employees. During the 1980s, VHS Company doubled its productivity of video manufacturing and accounted for almost two thirds of the entire videocassette market. The success and achievement of VHS Company dinitely owe to the respect and admiration of the whole employees for their CEO Franklin Robert.
Another solid example of former president Bill Clinton can also account for this common sense. Even thoughClintonassumed the position of president, military officers and most other subordinates did not respect his leadership for the simple reason thatClintonevaded military service during theVietnamconflict. Because his poor performance in military service, it is natural that most his military subordinates and officials in the White House show little respect for him.
On the other hand, this common sense does not mean that a respectable leader should acquire all the needed skills he or she expects others to perform. A leader may encounter a considerable number of tasks every day and thus have little time to deal with each of them. Perhaps the optimal way to address these tasks is to make long term plan to enhance productivity in order to address them fectively. As a result, a leader should make best strategy while his employees should perform specific tasks to stick to the strategic plans. Consequently, we can draw a conclusion that the leaders and subordinates perform significantly different functions. It is to some extent unfair to require all the leaders to do the entire tasks of their employees. A qualified leader may be well informed of the tasks and jobs of his or her subordinates rather than do all of them. Otherwise a leader will be obscured by an omnipotent worker with all kinds of skills.
通過上面對gmat掌握滿分的成功經(jīng)驗分享,相信對于很多計劃參加gmat考試的人來說,要想在gmat作文考試中獲取滿分就需要做好充分的備考準備。
澳際提示:
1.GMAT作文解題技巧之從短題目入手
2.GMAT作文考試之ISSUE速成策略
3.gmat作文中的經(jīng)典范文句型
想要獲得更多咨詢服務點擊進入 >>>>有問題?找免費的澳際專家咨詢! 或聯(lián)系QQ客服: ,也可以通過評論處留言,把您最關心的問題告訴我們。
GMAT作文滿分之路gmat作文gmat作文如何在gmat作文考試中獲取滿分呢?對于很多計劃參加gmat考試的人來說,要想在gmat考試中獲取好的成績,就必須認真對待gmat考試中的每一個部分,gmat作文考試獲取滿分有哪些秘籍呢?下面就來看看gmat作文滿分是如何練成的。
我的GMAT一戰(zhàn)定在921,上海騰飛大廈。雖已過去一周,個中酸甜苦辣仍歷歷在目。正式考試從AWA作文部分起就一直精神恍惚,心跳加速,雙手發(fā)抖,曾經(jīng)在TOEFL作文上砍瓜切菜的我在打G的作文時雙手完全不聽使喚。后來在“破釜沉舟”的心理暗示下總算平定下來,順利過渡到Math部分。昨天順利收到Official Report,上面赫然寫著AWA:6.0(91%),我那顆撲騰的心啊,總算是安定了下來。此文主要針對AWA寫作,關于Math(Quantitative)和Verbal部分我不想班門弄斧,以免貽笑大方,盡管Math是滿分,但實際只準備了3周,就不誤導各位了。我的AWA寫作是9月15日開始準備的,總共才5天半時間,之前壓根不知G的作文考察神馬東東,依稀了解到有邏輯糾錯型作文(就是后來熟知的AA--Analytical Argument),我便汗顏。因為我的邏輯狂差,怕自己連文章的邏輯謬誤也看不透,于是5天半的準備期里AA訓練了3/4。我想說,GMAT作文不需要像TOEFL作文那樣傾力而為準備,但是一定要用好復習時間中的每一個小時,保證每天都有收獲。第一天要熟悉寫作機經(jīng)題庫,最好把每個題都看一遍,看看過來人如何組織思路,如何展開,如何舉例。不貪多,求質(zhì)量!另外就是出色的模板了。模板對于AA寫作尤為重要,但對于AI寫作,各位G友自己看著辦吧,可以自己去找點模板,反正我覺得在AI中模板是次要的,關鍵是觀點和論據(jù),如果各位看官有TOEFL的寫作背景,那么恭喜你,GMAT AI部分的準備會容易得多。言歸正傳,看完NN的思路、范文和模板后自己可以開始訓練了。記得用標準鍵盤,一開始不限時,天馬行空胡吹亂侃一通,然后對照牛人的作品找差距,自己修改。我第一篇AA寫作用了1小時10分鐘,因為我積累少,思路不正,有些邏輯謬誤看不出來,導致半天熬不出幾句話。這時千萬不要泄氣,不妨看看《孫遠AWA寶典》,絕對受益匪淺。還有,別忘了我們有OG12,這是市面上最權威的官方指南,研究透里面范文的行文和思路絕對能事半功倍!
此外,每個人的弱點并不相同,有的人害怕AA部分,比如像我這種邏輯很麻木的人,而不少人也許害怕AI部分,這時,你就要儲備和積累了。AI就謹記幾條定律:1、盡量寫多(500字以上最好),這樣論點可以充分展開和論述;2、多分段。(5段以上,6,7段最佳)3、舉例子,擺事實,講道理。例子真的很重要,你不需要苦逼地繞啊繞,一味說理,說理的同時舉些例子,能讓文章有血有肉,又能充字數(shù),一舉兩得啊。例子盡量舉實例,如果現(xiàn)編當然也可以,不過你在編人物、組織名稱時最好來個破折號,同位語說明一下這個家伙(或組織)是神馬玩意兒,這樣又能充字數(shù),又能欺騙E-rater,何樂不為?!3、如果你有良好的寫作功底那就多寫復雜句,多來幾個從句套從句,這是非常符合E-rater的口味的。當然這是有風險的,如果沒有系統(tǒng)地訓練過,那就回歸原始的簡單句吧,保證前提是---少出錯,爾后---寫出彩。4、建議多用高級詞匯,不要只會significant,of great importance了,學著用vital,critical,consequential;不要只會用firstly,secondly了,學著用Most conspicuously,the second point worth talking is that……不要等到寫作時囊中空空,這是最苦逼的,寫作是第一部分,倘若G考試沒開好頭,那么會嚴重影響后面的發(fā)揮。
我在考場上自感灰常杯具,因為耳邊只聽得大牛們噠噠噠的鍵盤聲,而自己剛好抽了兩個沒練過的考題,這一坨坨汗啊……后來腫么辦?寫唄,既來之,則安之,反正我是醬油黨,大不了一個月后再戰(zhàn)嘛。這一暗示,讓我頓時思如泉涌,然后就一瀉千里吧。苦悶的是自己構思耗了不少時間,打字速度也不快,后面狂飆不止,但估計也沒寫夠500字,可見,作文字數(shù)并非決定因素,但是一定要有清晰的行文和邏輯。但還是那句話,盡量寫多吧。引用名人名言或許是一個不錯的選擇。我的AI就以Franklin Roosevelt的名句結尾,可惜的是我背上的話完全因為緊張而一片空白,我就自己編了個從句套從句,大概意思反正是寫出來了。所以,G友們不要害怕記名言,如果真心記不住,那就大致把精華記下來吧。反正E-rater又不會去查證!
澳際提示:
1.GMAT作文解題技巧之從短題目入手
2.GMAT作文考試之ISSUE速成策略
3.gmat作文中的經(jīng)典范文句型
想要獲得更多咨詢服務點擊進入 >>>>有問題?找免費的澳際專家咨詢! 或聯(lián)系QQ客服: ,也可以通過評論處留言,把您最關心的問題告訴我們。
上123下
共3頁
閱讀全文Amy GUO 經(jīng)驗: 17年 案例:4539 擅長:美國,澳洲,亞洲,歐洲
本網(wǎng)站(m.innerlightcrystal.com,刊載的所有內(nèi)容,訪問者可將本網(wǎng)站提供的內(nèi)容或服務用于個人學習、研究或欣賞,以及其他非商業(yè)性或非盈利性用途,但同時應遵守著作權法及其他相關法律規(guī)定,不得侵犯本網(wǎng)站及相關權利人的合法權利。除此以外,將本網(wǎng)站任何內(nèi)容或服務用于其他用途時,須征得本網(wǎng)站及相關權利人的書面許可,并支付報酬。
本網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容原作者如不愿意在本網(wǎng)站刊登內(nèi)容,請及時通知本站,予以刪除。